Best Framer Export Tools in 2026 (Honest Comparison)

The best Framer export tool depends on what you need out and what you can access. With only the public URL, a whole-site code project (Next.js components, Astro or HTML) points to FramerToNextJS or Deframer, and a static HTML ZIP points to PullPage, ExFlow or NoCodeXport; edit access and a wish to export from inside the editor points to a marketplace plugin such as Full Site Export; a few components for an existing React app points to React Export or Reframe. Framer itself has no built-in export, so every route is a third-party one. Here's an honest comparison of the real options in 2026 — including where each one is weak.

(Disclosure: this site is FramerToNextJS. The comparison below is factual about what each approach does, as their own pages described them on 31 October 2026, when this post was last updated; verify competitors' current features and pricing on their own sites.)

What "exporting Framer" actually requires

A published Framer site is rendered HTML plus Framer's JavaScript runtime, with assets on Framer's CDN. A genuine export tool has to solve four problems:

1. Discovery — find every page, not just the homepage
2. Assets — copy images into the export, and be clear about what still loads from Framer's CDN
3. The runtime — keep it (fidelity) or replace it (a rebuild), deliberately
4. SEO — preserve meta, fix canonicals so Google credits your domain

Judge any tool against those four. "Saves the page source" fails three of them.

The options

FramerToNextJS (this tool)

What it is: a Framer converter that works from your published URL, with three outputs — a real Next.js App Router project whose pages are split into named React components, one per Framer section; an Astro project with one component per section; or an optimized static HTML bundle. All three keep Framer's runtime, which loads from Framer's CDN together with fonts, so animations and interactions behave as authored; all copy images into the export as WebP, remove trackers, and run an SEO pass.

Strengths: the whole site in one run from the public URL, with no access to the Framer project needed. Component files that still render the original — a prerender step renders the Next.js components back to the original DOM, with 100% measured element parity on the sites we tested. After export: a visual editor, a CMS, one-click deploys to your own Vercel or Cloudflare account, and an MCP server so Claude, Cursor or Codex can edit and publish the converted site.

Weaknesses: public pages only, and the Framer project should stay published, since the runtime and fonts still load from it. Not a speed rebuild: because the runtime stays, most of the original JavaScript still loads — across 10 Framer templates we tested in July 2026, the Next.js output's average mobile Lighthouse Performance went from 82.1 to 69.8 (Accessibility improved on all 10) — so measure your own site in PageSpeed Insights. Paid — a one-time purchase, see pricing.

Deframer

What it is: a converter that reads your published Framer site and returns it as a Next.js codebase, keeping Framer's runtime inside the app so nothing is rebuilt by hand. It's the closest tool to FramerToNextJS's Next.js mode.

Strengths: works from the public link with no Framer account or plugin; a free preview of your landing page before you pay; a one-time lifetime price and a 30-day money-back guarantee.

Weaknesses: Next.js is the only output — no Astro or plain HTML bundle. Like FramerToNextJS, it keeps the runtime, so don't expect a speed rebuild either.

PullPage

What it is: an exporter that turns a published Framer site into an HTML/CSS/JS ZIP, or, on its Ultra tier, into an editable Astro project.

Strengths: a free tier (3 Lite exports a month), pay-per-export or a low monthly plan for full exports with GitHub sync, and an optional human QA add-on.

Weaknesses: no Next.js or React output. Astro is the Ultra tier, priced per project ($99 one-time for up to 10 designed pages, with larger tiers above that).

ExFlow

What it is: a multi-platform exporter (Webflow, Squarespace and Framer) that renders your site in a real browser and gives it back as static HTML.

Strengths: exports to a ZIP or syncs to a Git repository, FTP/SFTP, S3 or ExFlow's own hosting; a free plan, with paid plans billed monthly.

Weaknesses (for Framer specifically): HTML output only, no code project; the paid plans are subscriptions rather than a one-time purchase.

Framer marketplace plugins (Full Site Export, Framer to Code)

What they are: third-party plugins that export from inside the Framer editor. Full Site Export offers a static copy, a Next.js copy, or a readable React rebuild; Framer to Code exports the whole site with Framer's runtimes bundled.

Strengths: no separate tool to learn if you already work in the project. Check each plugin's current pricing in the Framer marketplace.

Weaknesses: they run inside the Framer editor, so you need the project open there — a published URL alone isn't enough. Full Site Export describes its readable React mode as close to your site, not identical.

Component plugins (React Export + unframer, Reframe)

What they are: plugins that copy individual Framer components into a React app you already have, using a CLI.

Strengths: exactly right for reusing a Framer-designed hero or pricing table inside an existing Next.js codebase.

Weaknesses: they don't export a site, and they need edit access to the project. React Export is a paid plugin; its pricing is shown inside the plugin in Framer.

NoCodeXport

What it is: a multi-platform exporter that turns no-code sites (Framer among several builders) into static HTML ZIPs.

Strengths: breadth — one tool across multiple builders; straightforward ZIP output.

Weaknesses (for Framer specifically): HTML-only output (no code project), and optimization depth and pricing should be verified on their site. Full breakdown: FramerToNextJS vs NoCodeXport.

ConvertFramer

What it is: a per-page converter: you export a file from its Chrome extension, upload it, and get one page back as a React / Next.js project with JSX and extracted CSS.

Strengths: component-style output for a single page, and a human-assisted migration service if you want someone else to do it.

Weaknesses: $15 per page for the automated tier, which doesn't keep Framer's responsive behaviour; animations are part of its paid migration service. Full breakdown: FramerToNextJS vs ConvertFramer.

Manual export (View Source)

What it is: save each published page's HTML by hand.

Strengths: free, zero tools, fine for grabbing one page's markup as reference.

Weaknesses: assets stay on Framer's CDN (break on unpublish), the heavy runtime comes along, no SEO fixes, and it's per-page manual labor. Not a migration path.

Rebuilding by hand

What it is: re-implement the design in your stack of choice.

Strengths: cleanest possible code, exactly your conventions.

Weaknesses: days-to-weeks of work per site, and pixel drift is inevitable. Worth it only when the site is becoming a real product — and even then, converting first and rebuilding incrementally is usually smarter (see Framer to React).

Head-to-head

How to choose in 30 seconds

• You only have the public URL and want editable code for the whole site → Next.js export or Astro export (or Deframer for Next.js only)
• You only have the public URL and want plain files → HTML export, PullPage or ExFlow
• You can edit the Framer project and want to export from inside it → a marketplace plugin such as Full Site Export
• You need a few Framer components inside an existing React app → React Export + unframer, or Reframe
• Several different builders to export → NoCodeXport or ExFlow
• One page's markup for reference → manual
• Site becoming a product → convert now, rebuild incrementally

Whichever you pick, export before canceling any paid plan so the conversion captures your live site — order of operations in cancel Framer, keep your website.